27 February 2015

Logs: 23-26 February

05116.1 ---: unid 2135 FSK 200bd/200 (sounding like Pactor-I) but not decodable (25Feb15) (AAI)
05305.5 ---: Russian Mil (reported as "RJP" area of Bibirevo Shat'kovo), RUS 2115 FSK 48bd/250 idling (25Feb15) (AAI)
08971.0 ---: unid NATO Tactical Data Link 1405 LINK-11/Slew in traffic (25Feb15) (AAI)
09202.0 ---: unid NATO Tactical Data Link 1420 LINK-11/Slew ISB in traffic (25Feb15) (AAI)
10074.0 5CIN1D: unid asset/network 1236 USB MIL-188-141A clg 5CIN2D + handshake then STANAG-4285 single burst (26Feb15) (AAI)
10114.7 ---: Russian Long Range Aviation Command, RUS 0700 FSK 100bd/1000 traffic not decoded (26Feb15) (AAI)
10169.5 ---: unid 0645 FSK 100bd/2000 traffic and idles, not decoded (26Feb15) (AAI)
10175.0 334013: Turkish Emergency Malatya, TUR 1230 USB MIL-188-141A sndg (26Feb15) (AAI)
10370.0 SNB813: Polish Military, POL 1231 USB MIL-188-141A clg SPT424 + handshake (26Feb15) (AAI)
14557.0 ---: Russian Long Range Aviation Command, RUS 1350 FSK 100bd/1000 idling (26Feb15) (AAI)
15483.1 ---: Russian Intel/Diplo 1340 FSK 200bd/1000 (cf) Link ID 49237:26th of month:Msg Number 235 Type 07145 (26Feb15) (AAI)
16161.0 20001: unid asset/network 1447 MIL-188-141A clg 5601 (23Feb15) (AAI)
17052.0 4XZ: Israeli Navy Haifa, ISR 1352 CW "= = VVV DE 4XZ 4XZ" (25Feb15) (AAI)
19632.6 M51: French MIL Intel Favieres, F 1405 CW 5LGs offline crypto (23Feb15) (AAI)
19794.0 XSG: Shangai Radio, CHN 1415 J3E female voice + id tones (23Feb15) (AAI)


unid FMCW OTH double-signal radar


Just another double OTH radar signal, mode FMCW, up-chirped, about 635 Khz spaced.The two signals have different sweep-rates (25 and 50 sps) and spread same 20 Khz band.
I think that the two visible bursts could be their related sounders, but Im not sure. These two sounders both run at 40 sweep/sec, 10 Khz bandwidth.



Below the analisys of the two (in my opinion) burst sounders:



22 February 2015

unid FMCW OTH double-signal radar and related sounders

interesting pair of signals (indicated by 'a' and 'b'), FMCW and 500 kHz spaced, most likely from the same OTH Radar (RAF Cyprus ?). Both occupy 20 kHz of bandwidth with 25 sps sweep-rate.
The left signal (a) is 'down-chirped' (sweeps start from the higher frequency and terminate at the lower frequency, ie descending freq.) while the right one (b) is 'up-chirped' (ascending freq.)


Note the two sounders of this radar: they start and stop at frequencies which are equidistant from the two signals (in a neighborhood of the two signals) and have the same chirp pattern (down and up) of the two radar signals to which they are subservient.

It could be assumed the that the frequency management of the doubled radar signal is achieved just by using these sounder.

"Ghadir": Iranian OTH burst radar


Ghadir, the Over The Horizon (OTH) Radar from Iran, is daily transmitting on our 10 m-band, often long lasting on 28245 kHz. 

You can hear a high and a low tone, corresponding to the sweeprates of 870 and 307 sweeps/sec. sent in two separated bursts. The system is  about 60 kHz wide, the splatters are covering +/- 250 kHz.
In June 2014, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corp Aerospace Force (IRGC-ASF) unveiled the ‘Ghadir’ over-the-horizon (OTH) radar at an undisclosed site near the city of Garmsar in the Semnan province east of Tehran. According to media reports, the Ghadir is a 360°, 3D-radar, with a ceiling of 300 km, and a maximum range of 1,100 km.

The site itself is located about 13 km southeast of the city itself, where the county’s rural farmland meets the desert. Google Earth offers imagery of the site from 09/2009, 08/2011, and 07/2013. The site is isolated, with no nearby garrisons or other air-defense sites.
Contradicting media reports, which claim that the radar was first tested during the Payambar-e Azam 6 exercises in June 2011, imagery from 08/2011 shows that construction had not yet begun by this time.
http://osimint.com/2014/08/27/irans-new-oth-radar-located/ 


Logs: 15-20 February

10223.7 --- MFA Cairo, EGY 2020 USB ARQ/Sitor-A 100bd/170 wkg Washington  (15Feb15) (AAI)
10467.5 --- unid NATO station 1255 USB STANAG-4285 null traffic, idling (20Feb15) (AAI)
10713.0 SPT424 Polish Military, POL USB MIL-188-141A clg SNB813 then voice chat (16Feb15) (AAI)
13714.2 --- Russian Intel/Diplo 1335 USB AT-3004D 12-PSK tones modem (16Feb15) (AAI)
15920.0 CFH Canadian Forces, Halifax C 1305 USB FSK 75bd/850 NAWS DE CFH (20Feb15) (AAI)
16154.0 --- Russian Intel/Diplo 1332 USB FSK 200bd/1000 messages blocks on Link ID 49237(19Feb15) (AAI)
16344.0 --- Russian Intel/Diplo 1405 USB Serdolik/CROWD-36 (19Feb15) (AAI)
19890.2 --- UK MIL DHFCS, probably Akrotiri 1305 USB STANAG-4285/1200L encrypted (19Feb15) (AAI)
22910.0 NKW US Navy Diego Garcia, DGI 1247 USB FSK 50bd/850 in traffic // 22741.0 (19Feb15) (AAI)
20981.0 --- unid NATO station 1300 USB STANAG-4285/1200L encrypted (19Feb15) (AAI)



19 February 2015

CIS-45 v1 HDR modem 33.33 Bd BPSK stream



Number of channels: 45 + 1 pilot tone (~ 3300 Hertz)
Manipulation in the channels: 2-PSK
Step between channels (frequency net/grid): 62.5 Hz
Manipulation speed (Baud rate): 33.33


The signal has the same features of CIS-45 Version 1 burst-mode, but here it is used in stream-mode. This is the third variant I have seen of CIS-45 modem other than CIS-45 v2 (40 Bd stream) and CIS-45 v1 (33.33 Bd burst)



18 February 2015

unid FMCW down-chirp OTH radar


This OTH radar was noted on 29790.0 Khz (center frequency), bandwidth about 20 Khz and mode FMCW. The sweep-rate of the system, at least at this scan session,  was 25 sweeps/sec.


The spectrum reveals two interesting features related to the heard scan-session:

1) the sweeps are down-chirp, i.e. the signal varies it frequency from the higher value to the lower value;

2) looking more closely at the spectrum by zooming a portion of frequency, we may see not only the short-path (direct) signal, obviously, but also the back scatter signals (the returned echoes)  that are characterized by very low values of energy. This is clearly visible below:


16 February 2015

multi-waveform sounder


heard on 9970.0 KHz (cf), about 3.6 Khz badwidth. The sounder consists of a "train" of n different length bursts, each burst has different sweep-rate and ends with a 200 msec tone, last tone is 380 msec width.Unfortunatelly, I went into this transmission when the sounder was still on-air, so I had the time to observe only the last three bursts, below reported as burst n-2, burst n-1 and burst n
 
Below the analysis of the bursts, as precise as possible since my resources; as you may see, this is an FMCW system:

burst n-2

burst n-1

burst n

The scan session is characterized by descending sweep-rates (about: 16 -> 10 -> 4 sweeps/sec), I think it's oriented to test different propagations conditions at that same frequency but with different sweep-rates.
I hope to hear again this sounder so to write a better and complete analysis.

13 February 2015

Logs: 09-13 February

14430.0 CHL: Algerian Air Force, ALG 1241 USB MIL-188-141A clg COF (12Feb15) (AAI)
14550.0 X24: Moroccan military, MRC 1230 USB MIL-188-141A sndg (13Feb15) (AAI)
14550.0 R31: Moroccan military, MRC 1234 USB MIL-188-141A sndg (13Feb15) (AAI)
14550.0 J62: Moroccan military, MRC 1238 USB MIL-188-141A sndg (13Feb15) (AAI)
14550.0 O73: Moroccan military, MRC 1239 USB MIL-188-141A sndg (13Feb15) (AAI)
 ---unids
14485.0 ---: unid 1255 USB FSK/50bd/500 reversals (12Feb15) (AAI)
16074.0 ---: Russian Mil, RUS 1535 USB FSK 75bd/500 (09Feb15) (AAI)
16145.0 ---: Russian Diplo/Intel 1207 USB MFSK/CROWD-36 (11Feb15) (AAI)
16381.5 ---: unid North Korean Embassy 1300 LSB ARQ FSK/600bd/600 (aka DPRK-ARQ) bursts s/off 1310 (12Feb15) (AAI)
16913.0 ---: prob. Australian Def. Force North West Cape, AUS 1325 USB MIL 188-110A 2400bd (12Feb15) (AAI)
20280.0 ---: prob. Australian Def. Force North West Cape, AUS 1550 USB MIL 188-110A 2400bd (09Feb15) (AAI)


unid FMOP OTH radar 16Kz BW, 50 sps

looking at the spectrum you may see that the tansmitter is off air between sweeps (duty clycle < 100%):  this leads to an FMOP system and then possibly sourced by Russian mil (50 sweeps/sec variant of 29B6 Kontainer ?)


The signal was copied on 14574.0 Khz (cf) and spreads up to 16 Khz bandwidth. It has a sweep-rate of 50 sweeps/sec and transmits in FMOP mode.



11 February 2015

JORN: Australian Defence Force (ADF) OTH radar

Australia’s Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN) is operated by the Australian Defence Force (ADF) and comprises three Over The Horizon Backscattered Radar systems and forms part of a layered surveillance network providing coverage of Australia’s northern approaches.

JORN is an FMCW "burst system" covering 10 Khz bandwidth with different sweeprates, this feature is clearly visible in its spectrum:

I heard a quite long session from JORN on 11 February, at 1240z on 18589.0 KHz. According to my observations on the received session, the system transmits sequences of 5 bursts on 10KHz bandwidth, each burst contains 64 sweeps and a single sequence is 9.5 seconds long.

Each burst switches the radar swee-prate to short range (high sweprates) and to long range (lower sweeprates) and is "announced" by an intro-tone (a "pilot tone" one ?) at the center QRG: I do not know if these tones are for sync purposes of the receiving system.


b1: 28us sweep width
b2: 24us sweep width
b3: 30us sweep width
b4: 27us sweep width
b5: 25us sweep width

(the accuracy of the measurements depends on me and the used tool)




The Australian Defence Force (ADF) currently operates three OTHR systems as part of the Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN). These radars are dispersed across Australia — at Longreach in Queensland, Laverton in Western Australia and Alice Springs in the Northern Territory — to provide surveillance coverage of Australia’s northern approaches.
• Radar data from these sensors is conveyed to the JORN Coordination Centre (JCC) within the Air Force’s No 1 Radar Surveillance Unit (1RSU) at RAAF Base Edinburgh in South Australia. 1RSU is tasked by higher headquarters to operate the JORN capability on a daily basis.
• JORN does not operate on a 24 hour basis except during military contingencies. Defence’s peacetime use of JORN focuses on those objects that the system has been designed to detect, thus ensuring efficient use of resources.
• The JORN radars have an operating range of 1000–3000km, as measured from the radar array. Figure 2 depicts the locations of the three OTHR systems and the JCC, and highlights the coverage of each radar. Of note, the Alice Springs and Longreach radars cover an arc of 90 degrees each, whereas the Laverton OTHR coverage area extends through 180 degrees.
JORN is expected to detect air objects equivalent in size to a BAe Hawk-127 aircraft or larger and maritime objects equivalent in size and construction to an Armidale-class patrol boat or larger.

JORN is currently undergoing a capability upgrade under JP2025 Phase 5 (1987 Defence White Paper, Joint Project 2025). This project will incrementally deliver a number of capability enhancements to the current JORN radars located at Longreach and Laverton, and will compliment upgrades delivered under Phases 3 and 4 to bring these radars up to the current technological specification of the OTHR at Alice Springs. Phase 5 will also integrate the Alice Spring OTHR into the Jindalee Operational Radar Network.
• The capability upgrade under JP2025 Phase 5 is based on the specifications originally described in the 1987 Department of Defence White Paper, ‘The Defence of Australia’.

9 February 2015

29B6: Russian FMOP OTH Radar "Kontainer"

Russian Air and Space Defense Forces began deployment of a network of 29B6 over-the-horizon (OTH) radars, code-named "Kontainer" in the early 2013. The Russian 29B6 radar is generally less wide than PLUTO, typically around 14 kHz width.


observed on 19475.0 Khz
bandwidth about 14Khz,
modulation: FMOP (Frequency Modulation On Pulse)
sweep-rate: 50 sps







Both the British PLUTO and the Russian 29B6 most often use the sweeprate of 50 sps .This yields a maximum unambiguous range (since neither radar encodes the sweeps) of 3000 km.  The 29B6 uses FMOP (Frequency Modulation On Pulse) while PLUTO uses FMCW (Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave): while they sound somewhat similar they are slightly different, with the 29B6 having a slightly “rougher” sound than PLUTO,  moreover Russian 29B6 can be harder to visually or aurally define the edges of, so it could be reportsed with a wider width than it is actually using.


The first one began "experimental-combat" operations in Kovylkino, Mordovia, on 2 December 2013. The radar is reported to have a range of about 3000 km, which allows it to detect aircraft over large part of Europe.
 
video clip introducing the new 29B6 OTH radar installation:
http://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201312031334-4e99.htm
 


The Kolkino radar station, using the first modernized 29B6 radar, is able to track aerial targets flying as far aways as Denmark. Earlier the radar had a research role only, and even if full operational capability is expected within 2 years, the new system is already keeping an eye on what flies west of the Russian border. Another 29B6 radar should be installed in the far eastern Russian territories, achieving operational status in 2018.



The radar is made of 150 antenna masts, data transmission systems, transmitters and receivers, power station and control building. The peculiarity of the system is that it is able to detect both high altitude targets, such as ICBMs (Inter Continental Ballistic Missiles), as well as low altitude flying air traffic, at very long distances, well beyond the line of sight.
Based on the Russian claims reported by Defence24.pl, any aircraft with a radar cross section comparable to the one of a Cessna light plane would be detected by the new radar, even if it is flying at low altitude. Even a fighter jet taking-off in the Netherlands could be seen by the new surveillance station!


http://www.russiadefence.net/t2547p105-russian-radar-systems

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/150118/russia-deploys-new-over_the_horizon-radar.html




PLUTO: UK RAF FMCW OTH Radar

The British Royal Airforce is operating the so-named PLUTO OTH Radar in their base in Akrotiri, Cyprus. It is often on 10, 21 and 28 MHz HAM bands with sweeprates of 25 and 50 sweeps/sec, sometimes 12.5 sweeps/sec



bandwidth about 20 Khz,
modulation: FMCW (Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave)
sweep-rate: 50 sps





 
 Below, the radar heard on 8070.0 Khz, 20 Khz bandwidth but with a sweep-rate of 25 sps:




OTH radars can detect and track aircraft, missiles in the atmosphere, and even large ships within the coverage fan as long as the objects are at least 500-1000 km from the radar and no more than about 5000 km, with the best coverage in the 1000-3500 km range.
The area covered by such radars is usually a fan extending in a line perpendicular to the transmitter array and as much as 50 degrees to either side, for a total fan width of up to 100 degrees. Although some OTH radars have a much narrower fan (ca 60 degrees), the alignment of the receiver arrays at Agios Nikolaos suggests that this system does have a wide fan. 
PLUTO transmitter SITE, north From Akrotiri (Cyprus)

This image shows approximately what the fan for the Pluto radar might look like, assuming that it is as wide as estimated above. The concentric arcs are at 1000 km intervals and the radiating lines are at 10 degree intervals. As can be seen, the fan covers little or none of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Israel, but provides good coverage of Iraq, Iran, the Gulf States, part of Saudi Arabia, and most of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the former Soviet Stans, and possible coverage of part of India. The Russian launch areas at Baikonur and Kapustin Yar are probably covered, as is the Persian Gulf and much of the Arabian Sea.

The receiver element, typically one or more long, linear arrays of antennas, is usually somewhat distant from the transmit site, as much as 100 km. In the case of this system, the receivers are likely to be at the other British Sovereign Base Area, Agios Nikolaos. There are three long white rectangular areas visible in the low-res GE imagery of Agios Nikolaos that might be the system's receive arrays.





 

hopping sounder (10Khz bw, 10 sps)


observed on 19845 Khz (cf), hopping its working frequency.

I used first the oscilloscope to get a measure of the distances between two consecutive sweeps:


The sounder is 100 msec delay between the sweeps, so (1000 msec/100 msec) = 10 sweeps per second (or 10 sps). The sweeps can also be observed, and measured, in the frequency domain: as expected, the sweep rate is 10 sps (100 ms distance between two sweeps). Modulation is FMOP.



This signal hops frequencies in a specific manner. It starts moving up the band in various intervals then it goes back and starts again, overlapping Amateur and broadcast shortwave bands.

8 February 2015

Logs: 04-07 February

08797.0 BB2: Israeli Air Force, ISR 2106 USB MIL-188-141A,ALE sndg (04Feb15) (AAI)
10123.7 OOVC: Egyptian Embassy New Delhi, IND 1503 USB SITOR-A ARQ 100bd/170 QSX 19163.7 with MFA Cairo (05Feb15) (AAI)
10175.0 8131: Turkish Civil Defense Bitlis, TUR 1953 USB USB MIL-188-141A,ALE sndg (05Feb15) (AAI)
12701.1 ---: French Navy CdTM Saissac,F 1405 FSK 50bd/850 (ACF=21) in traffic (07Feb15) (AAI)
16048.0 FLTS: unid Russian Mil 1347 CW "TPJB DE FLTS ZUZ ZFR ZTT = ZNI ZFF ZCO K" (06Feb15) (AAI)
16263.5 FAV22: French CSTEI Favieres/Vernon, F 1312 CW "...MITNX ZJXWX BVFXL WYTNT CZRIE ZQFSP KSLPN XBTVA TCZUN" (06Feb15) (AAI)
16325.5 ---: North Korean Embassy (Europe) 1510 USB DPRK-ARQ/1200bd/1200 burst tfc QSX 16888.5 unid Embassy (04Feb15) (AAI)
16684.5 OSY: Sailmail Brugge, BEL 1235 UB PACTOR-III 200bd/800 "25YY! 25YY! 25YY! 25YY!" (07Feb15) (AAI)
19502.2 ---: Sudanese Diplo, SDN 1303 USB PACTOR-I FEC 200bd/200 msg "18888 stno ftype .bag size 1678" then into crypto, ending voice chat (05Feb15) (AAI)
21764.1 ---: unid Russian Mil 1510 USB T600/FSK 50bd/200 in idling (07Feb15) (AAI)



OTH radar: FMCW principles

Frequency Modulated Continuous Waveform (abbreviated  FMCW) radar differs from pulsed radar in that an electromagnetic signal is continuously transmitted. The frequency of this signal changes over time, generally in a sweep across a set bandwidth. The name chirp is then a signal in which the frequency increases (up-chirp) or decreases (down-chirp) with time. In some sources, the term chirp is used interchangeably with sweep signal, or simply sweep.

A variety of waveforms is possible since the transmitter frequency can slew up and down as follows: sine wave, sawtooth wave, triangle wave and square wave.

A linear chirp waveform; a sinusoidal wave that increases in frequency linearly over time


Spectrogram of a Linear Chirp. The Spectrogram plot demonstrates the linear rate of change in frequency as a function of time, in this case from 0 to 7 kHz repeating every 2.3 seconds. The intensity of the plot is proportional to the energy content in the signal at the indicated frequency and time ( "LinearChirp" by Spyrogumas - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons)

The difference in frequency between the transmitted and received (reflected) signal is determined by mixing the two signals, producing a new signal which can be measured to determine distance or velocity (the received signal is mixed with the emitted signal and due to the delay caused by the time of flight for the reflected signal, there will be a frequency difference that can be detected as a signal in the low frequency range).


FMCW radar is then an indirect method of distance measurement. The transmitted frequency is modulated between two known values,f1 and f2,and the difference between the transmitted signal and the return echo signal,fd, is measured. This difference frequency is directly proportional to the transit time and hence the distance.

The bandwidth of an FMCW radar is the difference between the start and finish frequency of the linear frequency modulation sweep (sweep width). The amplitude of the FMCW signal is constant across the range of frequencies. A wider bandwidth produces narrower difference frequency ranges for each echo on the frequency spectrum. This leads to better range resolution. The sweep width determines the spatial resolution of the radar: sweeps must be shorter than the time it takes for the signal to travel between the target details; otherwise, the sweeps overlap in the receiver.
The sweep repetition frequency (sweep-rate, sps) determines the maximum unambiguous range to the target. The next (non-coded) sweep cannot be sent until the previous sweep has traveled to the target and back. (Coded sweeps can be sent more frequently because coding can be used to associate responses with their corresponding transmitted sweep.)
Short sweeps with a low repetition rate maximize resolution and unambiguous range and high sweep power maximizes the radar’s range in distance. 

Below some measurements of a FMCW OTH-B radar signal, obtained by analyzing the recorderd signal with Signals Analyzer (great software by radioscanner.ru



To approach this kind of transmissions you should run an (at least) 20Khz bandwidth receiver, such an SDR, and record the signal in a .wav file using 48 Khz sample rate value. The analysis is then run off-line, by play-backing the recordered signal.


Synthesized system are not sweeping the frequency continuously, but rather step the frequency with a set of discrete frequency points. Thus, these systems are also called Stepped Frequency Continuous Waveform (abbreviated SFCW) radar. The synthesized signal source assures very precise frequency control, which is important for the accuracy and repeatability of measurements.



7 February 2015

phased array antenna

In antenna theory, a phased array is an array of antennas in which the relative phases of the respective signals feeding the antennas are varied in such a way that the effective radiation pattern of the array is reinforced in a desired direction and suppressed in undesired directions. Usually, the spatial relationship of the individual antennas also contributes to the directivity of the antenna array.  One common application of this is with a standard multiband television antenna, which has multiple elements coupled together and in radar applications.
Phased array may be used to point a fixed radiation pattern, or to scan rapidly in azimuth or elevation. Simultaneous electrical scanning in both azimuth and elevation is also possible.
Publisher: Christian Wolff
Text is available under the GNU Free Documentation License, and the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, additional terms may apply.


A phased array antenna is composed of lots of radiating elements each with a phase shifter. Beams are formed by shifting the phase of the signal emitted from each radiating element, to provide constructive/destructive interference so as to steer the beams in the desired direction. 

The main beam always points in the direction of the increasing phase shift. Well, if the signal to be radiated is delivered through an electronic phase shifter giving a continuous phase shift then the beam direction will be electronically adjustable. However, this cannot be extended unlimitedly. The highest value, which can be achieved for the Field of View (FOV) of a planar phased array antenna is 120° (60° left and 60° right). With the sine theorem the necessary phase moving can be calculated.
 
One of the fundamental difficulties in designing a phased array is that significant portions of the wave power transmitted by one element of the array can be received by the surrounding array antenna elements. This effect, which is known as array mutual coupling, can result in a substantial or total loss of transmitted or received radar signal, depending on the coherent combination of all of the mutual-coupling signals in the array.
The amplitudes and phases of the array mutual-coupling signals depend primarily on the shape of the radiating antenna elements, the spacing between the array elements, and the number of radiating elements. There are as many different design possibilities for phased arrays as there are dozens of different radiating array elements to choose from, and the spacing and number of radiating elements can vary widely, depending on the scanning requirements.